Weighted Average Cost of Capital Problem Description
Scenario: You work for an investment banking firm and have been asked by management of Vestor Corporation (not real), a software development company, to calculate its weighted average cost of capital, to use in evaluating a new company investment. The firm is considering a new investment in a warehousing facility, which it believes will generate an internal rate of return of 11.5%. The market value of Vestor’s capital structure is as follows:
Source of Capital
To finance the investment, Vestor has issued 20 year bonds with a $1,000 par value, 6% coupon rate and at a market price of $950. Preferred stock paying a $2.50 annual dividend was sold for $25 per share. Common stock of Vestor is currently selling for $50 per share and has a Beta of 1.2. The firm’s tax rate is 34%. The expected market return of the S&P 500 is 13% and the 10-Year Treasury note is currently yielding 3.5%.
Determine what discount rate (WACC) Vestor should use to evaluate the warehousing facility project.
Show all calculations.
Needs Improvement (2)
Accuracy of solution
Solution has no errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language.
Solution has a few errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable.
Solution has errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required.
Solution has numerous errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use.
Solution Organization and Formatting
Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.
Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.
Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.
Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.
Solution workings /Thinking
Solution workings are comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.
Solution workings are sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.
Solution workings are fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.
Solution workings are very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.