Week 6 Discussion: Math Teaching Approach
|# OF SOURCES||2|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||4 ≈ 1100 WORDS|
Watch the video below in which Robert Ahdoot presents his approach to conquering math anxiety. In the middle of the video, Ahdoot provides his specific approach and examples that illustrate how he teaches math. After viewing the video, answer the questions below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66y4W5HervQ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Considering your history with math, assess Mr. Ahdoot’s method of teaching:
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please read the grading requirements of the rubric before you start doing your assignment.
|Excellent (4)||Good (3)||Needs Improvement (2)||Poor (1)|
|Discussion post has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of academic language.||Discussion post has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of academic language is acceptable.||Discussion post has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate academic language is required.||Discussion post has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for academic use.|
|Discussion post Organization and Formatting||Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.||Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.||Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.||Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.|
|Discussion Post Content/Thinking||Discussion post content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.||Discussion post content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.||Discussion post content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.||Discussion post content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.|