Week 5 Discussion How to Lead A Team
|# OF SOURCES||3|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||3 ≈ 825 WORDS|
In this final week, we will shift to discuss how leaders can help facilitate effective teamwork. You will leverage what you have learned about communication, leadership, conflict resolution, and team dynamics to help the teams you work on make the best decisions they can.
For this week’s discussion, consider the learning activities you’ve completed and your own experience within a team.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 550 words:
This paper uses a grading rubric. Please review it before you start doing your assignment.
|Excellent (4)||Good (3)||Needs Improvement (2)||Poor (1)|
|Paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of managerial language.||Paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of managerial language is acceptable.||Paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate managerial language is required.||Paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for managerial use.|
|Paper Organization and Formatting||Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.||Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.||Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.||Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.|
|Paper Content/Thinking|| |
Paper Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.
Paper Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.
Paper Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.
Paper Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.