W3D1# 5.2 Nursing Shared Governance Model Paper
|# OF SOURCES||2|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||1 ≈ 300 WORDS|
Research “Nursing Shared Governance Models” and find a minimum of two articles.
Provide a summary of three key points about shared governance that you believe are the most beneficial.
Please use APA format for your discussion points and references
300 words document
Articles and citations have to be within the last 5 years.
Plagiarism receipt required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review it prior to starting your writing.
|Excellent (4)||Good (3)||Needs Improvement (2)||Poor (1)|
|Summary has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of professional nursing language.||Summary has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of professional nursing language is acceptable.||Summary has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate professional nursing language is required.||Summary has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for professional nursing use.|
|Summary Organization and Formatting||Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.||Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.||Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.||Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.|
|Summary content/relevance/Thinking||Summary content is relevant comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.||Summary content is relevant and sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.||Summary content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.||Summary content is irrelevant, very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.|