- Top rated Essay Writing Service. Hire our expert essay writers today!
- +1 (470) 465-4219
- support@academicessayist.com
US History II 01 Discussion Comment
US History II 01 Discussion Comment
| ORDER # | 100130 |
| PAPER TYPE | DISCUSSION COMMENT |
| WRITING LEVEL | COLLEGE |
| WRITING STYLE | APA |
| # OF SOURCES | 2 |
| NUMBER OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 2 ≈ 550 WORDS |
Submission instructions and Rubric
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please go through the rubric before you start writing your comment.
Grading Rubric
| Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
| Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Response to the discussion question has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language. | Response to the discussion question has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable. | Response to the discussion question has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required. | Response to the discussion question has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use. |
| Response to the discussion question Organization, Relevance and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
| Response to the discussion question content/Thinking | Response to the discussion question content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Response to the discussion question content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Response to the discussion question content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Response to the discussion question content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |
The 1920s was an era of profound social and cultural change. The wealth of the United States doubled during this decade, making it an unprecedented era of prosperity. However, underneath the surface, there were problems. Not only was income and wealth inequality rising again, but the Ku Klux Klan and anti-immigration sentiment and a new push-back against women’s equality (fear of the “New Woman”) were emerging. Were these fears based in people’s to the profound social change they were experiencing? How can we explain the rise and popularity of the Klan in the 1920s? Of anti-immigration sentiment? Of the “New Woman” and what she represented? Why did so many conservative movements arise in this period?
To get an answer for the US History II 01 Discussion Comment , please click on https://academicessayist.com/orders/ordernow
