- Top rated Essay Writing Service. Hire our expert essay writers today!
- +1 (470) 465-4219
- support@academicessayist.com
RUA NR 228 Nutritional Assessment Assignment
RUA NR 228 Nutritional Assessment Assignment
| ORDER # | 100512 |
| PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
| WRITING LEVEL | UNDERGRADUATE |
| WRITING STYLE | APA |
| # OF SOURCES | 4 |
| # OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 6 ≈ 1650 WORDS |
Evaluate, compare, and analyze menus from different agencies and suggest revisions for healthier food choices based on the cultural and age group. Students in a cultural concentration will use that specific cultural focus to complete this assignment. Those students in a cultural concentration (such as the Hispanic concentration) should be grouped together for this assignment. However, should the groups be mixed (with students in the cultural concentration and students not in the cultural concentration), the RUA must explore the cultural concentration (e.g., Hispanic)
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please read the requirements of the rubric before you start writing the paper.
Grading Rubric
Levels of Assessment
| Criteria | Inadequate=D (Below Standard) | Adequate=C (Meets Standard) | Above Average=B (Exceeds Standard) | Exemplary=A (Far Exceeds Standard) |
| Organization | Assessment lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors. | Assessment is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout assessment. | Assessment is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present. | Assessment shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. |
| Level of Content | Assessment Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal. | Assessment content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. | Assessment content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. | Assessment content indicates synthesis of ideas, in- depth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic. |
| Development | Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking. | Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present. | Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points | Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. |
| Grammar & Mechanics | Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent. | Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though assessment . Some errors remain. | Assessment has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons. | Assessment is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. |
| Style | Mostly in elementary form with little or no variety in sentence structure, diction, rhetorical devices or emphasis. | Approaches college level usage of some variety in sentence patterns, diction, and rhetorical devices. | Attains college level style; tone is appropriate and rhetorical devices used to enhance content; sentence variety used effectively. | Shows outstanding style going beyond usual college level; rhetorical devices and tone used effectively; creative use of sentence structure and coordination |
| Format | Fails to follow format and assignment requirements; incorrect margins, spacing and indentation; neatness of assessment needs attention. | Meets format and assignment requirements; generally correct margins, spacing, and indentations; assessment is neat but may have some assembly errors. | Meets format and assignment requirements; margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; assessment is neat and correctly assembled. | Meets all formal and assignment requirements and evidences attention to detail; all margins, spacing and indentations are correct; assessment is neat and correctly assembled with professional look. |
Please click on https://academicessayist.com/orders/ordernow for our essay writing team to assist you with the RUA NR 228 Nutritional Assessment Assignment.
