RaDonda Vaught Case Summary
|PAPER TYPE||CASE STUDY|
|# OF SOURCES||2|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||4 ≈ 1375 WORDS|
Please present a summary of the case study, how does this case impacts you as a nurse about to practice, and how did this case violate these ethical terms (non-maleficence, beneficence, fidelity).
Please include references provided in APA 7th Edition format.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Read the requirements of the rubric carefully before you start writing your summary.
Grading Rubric with Levels of Assessment
(Far Exceeds Standard)
|Organization||Case summary lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors.||Case summary is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic.|
Transitions evident but not used throughout the case summary.
|Case summary is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.||Case summary shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.|
|Level of Content||Case summary shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal.||Case summary content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas.||Case summary content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence.||Case summary content indicates synthesis of ideas, in- depth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.|
|Development||Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.||Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.||Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points||Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking.|
|Grammar & Mechanics||Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident.|
Errors are frequent.
|Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though the case summary. Some errors remain.||Case summary has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons.||Case summary is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.|
|Style||Mostly in elementary form with little or no variety in sentence structure, diction, rhetorical devices or emphasis.||Approaches college level usage of some variety in sentence patterns, diction, and rhetorical devices.||Attains college level style; tone is appropriate and rhetorical devices used to enhance content; sentence variety used effectively.||Shows outstanding style going beyond usual college level; rhetorical devices and tone used effectively; creative use of sentence structure and coordination|
|Format||Fails to follow format and assignment requirements; incorrect margins, spacing and indentation; neatness of Case summary needs attention.||Meets format and assignment requirements; generally correct margins, spacing, and indentations; Case summary is neat but may have some assembly errors.||Meets format and assignment requirements; margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; Case summary is neat and correctly assembled.||Meets all formal and assignment requirements and evidences attention to detail; all margins, spacing and indentations are correct; Case summary is neat and correctly assembled with professional look.|
Our essay writing experts can help you write your RaDonda Vaught Case Summary. Please click on https://academicessayist.com/orders/ordernow