Personal Quality Improvement Project
ORDER # | 100202 |
PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
WRITING LEVEL | MASTERS |
WRITING STYLE | APA |
# OF SOURCES | 4 |
# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 7 ≈ 1925 WORDS |
Topic: Improving time management
Requirements for Final Personal CQI Project due Week 11:
Minimum of a 7 page written account of your progress over a minimum of four weeks.
You must include your baseline and four weeks worth of data. Your paper should be APA format and font options include Calibri 11, Arial 11, Lucida Sans Unicode 10, Times New Roman 12, and Georgia 11. The paper is double spaced and the first page of the paper includes: Your full name The date of submission
Include your Statement of Purpose (why you chose your area), your AIM-what you are trying to accomplish, your goal, how you collected your data and evidence of your data collection.
Demonstrate and include the utilization of at least (2) CQI tools (Fishbone Diagram, graphs, control chart).
Demonstrate use of each step of the PDSA model for your project or submit a copy of PDSA Worksheet with your paper.
DATE DUE: Week 11
Post a minimum of 150 words on line of your outcomes and successes with your project. (This can be paraphrased from your paper).
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review it before you start writing your paper.
Grading Rubric
Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Project paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of academic language. | Project paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of academic language is acceptable. | Project paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate academic language is required. | Project paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for academic use. |
Project paper Organization and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
Project paper Content/Thinking | Project paper Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Project paper Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Project paper Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Project paper Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |
To get assistance with the Personal Quality Improvement Project, please click on https://academicessayist.com/orders/ordernow