Paper on Clinical Repository in the THS Strategy
ORDER # | 100318 |
PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
WRITING LEVEL | MASTERS |
WRITING STYLE | APA |
# OF SOURCES | 3 |
# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 5 ≈ 1375 WORDS |
Explain the role of the current clinical repository in the THS strategy.
Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
Must use at least three scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Check the requirements of the rubric before you start writing your paper.
Grading Rubric
Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Assignment has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of academic language. | Assignment has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of academic language is acceptable. | Assignment has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate academic language is required. | Assignment has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for academic use. |
Assignment Organization and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
Assignment content relevance/Thinking | Assignment content is relevant, comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Assignment content is relevant and sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Assignment content is not quite relevant , fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Assignment content is irrelevant, very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |
To get help in writing your Paper on Clinical Repository in the THS Strategy, please click on https://academicessayist.com/orders/ordernow