Logging in British Columbia Canada Discussion -

August 6, 2022

Logging in British Columbia Canada Discussion

Order ID	35675990
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA/MLA/CHICAGO
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Logging in British Columbia Canada Discussion

There are multiple sides to every story. For this assignment you will be required to work in groups of one, two, three or four in order to create a “point/counterpoint” type of an argument. The goal of this is to see how limiting the arguments can be when one side may be biased with an agenda. Many modern Canadian issues involve stakeholders from many different backgrounds, with many different opinions. Stakeholders are individuals who are directly involved in making decisions. They can be government officials, celebrities, company owners, neighborhood organizations, or anything else you find applicable. You are required to choose a stakeholder position (either for or against) one of the scenarios listed on page 3 of this assignment. Using this foundation, you must have a back and forth debate within your group. You were only asked to discuss the environmental challenges of these issues, however each of these also has many consequences for social, economic, and health parameters in Canada. How you organize this is up to you. You can choose to act as yourselves, or get into characters (an Indigenous group vs. Justin Trudeau, David Suzuki vs. an oil company, Donald Trump vs. An anti-coal group, etc). You must explain the format and setting of your debate (i.e., is it on Twitter between two or more political figures? Is it a transcript from an interview? Is it a video interview? Was it a Facebook argument? Is it on the class Discussion Forum?), and provide a copy of it (in text or picture/screen capture format).

If you are working alone or in a group of three or four you must have the same number of people in the conversation as you have in your group. You must also have seven exchanges but you will have more people in the exchange. For example, in a group of three the following you represent one exchange (this is obviously overly simplistic): Julia Tree hugger: The environment is precious and we need to save it! Charlie Cutdown: The environment is a resource for us to exploit! Miranda Middling: We need to strike a balance between environmental issues and human needs!

	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Needs Improvement (2)	Poor (1)
Language/Spelling/ Grammar	Presentation has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language.	Presentation has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable.	Presentation has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required.	Presentation has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use.
Presentation Organization and Formatting	Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.	Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.	Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.	Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.
Presentation Content/Thinking	Presentation Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.	Presentation Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.	Presentation Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.	Presentation Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.