Listeriosis Outbreaks Systematic Review Report -

August 6, 2022

Listeriosis Outbreaks Systematic Review Report

Order ID	35675990
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA/MLA/CHICAGO
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Listeriosis Outbreaks Systematic Review Report

I choose Listeriosis article

Methods (< 1 page): briefly describe the methods used for identifying outbreak investigations that were included in the systematic review (8 pts)

Database(s) used
Search terms
Year(s)
Language
Inclusion/exclusion criteria (do not include review articles!)
Figure showing the results (i.e. # articles) of various steps of the search process (e.g. initial search, exclusions, additional exclusions after review, final sample).

See the figure in this article for an example of an appropriate figure. Include a descriptive title. NOTE: A draft of the Methods section is due 10/21/2020 via Canvas. It is worth 10 points and accounts for 2.5% of your grade. In addition to the items above, include a reference list of articles included in the review as well as pdfs of all articles. Submit as a Word document. Grading for the draft of the Methods section will follow the rubric below:

	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Needs Improvement (2)	Poor (1)
Language/Spelling/ Grammar	Presentation has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language.	Presentation has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable.	Presentation has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required.	Presentation has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use.
Presentation Organization and Formatting	Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.	Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.	Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.	Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.
Presentation Content/Thinking	Presentation Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.	Presentation Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.	Presentation Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.	Presentation Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.