Leadership Development Research Paper
|# OF SOURCES||2|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||4≈ 1100 WORDS|
Write a three to four (3 – 4) page paper (900 -1200 words) on leadership development. Include at least two credible outside sources, in addition to the assigned readings in this Unit’s resources . Credible outside sources include peer reviewed journal articles and professional publications. Your paper will discuss the elements of leadership development, what gets developed, how leaders learn, the various methods on how leaders develop. Include an argument for what process you believe is most effective in developing leaders and also describe the criteria one should use to evaluate if leadership development programs are effective.
Examples of peer reviewed journals include:
Examples of professional journals include:
3 Resources should be use included the one below:
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please read the grading requirements of the rubric before you start working on your assignment.
|Excellent (4)||Good (3)||Needs Improvement (2)||Poor (1)|
|Research paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of management language.||Research paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of management language is acceptable.||Research paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate management language is required.||Research paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for management use.|
|Research paper Organization and Formatting||Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.||Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.||Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.||Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.|
|Research paper/Thinking||Research paper is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.||Research paper is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.||Research paper is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.||Research paper is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.|