Health Care Facilities Management Discussion
ORDER # | 100247 |
PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
WRITING LEVEL | MASTERS |
WRITING STYLE | APA |
# OF SOURCES | 4 |
# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 6 ≈ 1650 WORDS |
This week, you will research scholarly literature and timely information regarding health policies and quality indicators. Identify a regulatory agency, quality oversight group/agency, or another entity that is capturing and reporting on quality data at the local, state, or national level. You may also take a look at the entities that report quality data on an organizational level. Utilizing the entity you choose, discuss the following:
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please read it before you start writing your paper.
Grading Rubric
Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Discussion paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of academic language. | Discussion paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of academic language is acceptable. | Discussion paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate academic language is required. | Discussion paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for academic use. |
Discussion paper Organization and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
Discussion paper content /Thinking | Discussion paper content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Discussion paper content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Discussion paper content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Discussion paper content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |