- Top rated Essay Writing Service. Hire our expert essay writers today!
- +1 (470) 465-4219
- support@academicessayist.com
Evaluation of Healthcare Organization’s Strategic Plan
Evaluation of Healthcare Organization’s Strategic Plan
| ORDER # | 100236 |
| PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
| WRITING LEVEL | UNDERGRADUATE |
| WRITING STYLE | APA |
| # OF SOURCES | 3 |
| # OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 4≈ 1100 WORDS |
Work info is BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER . I WORK IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM
1. Discuss the mission and philosophy of a healthcare organization in relation to its strategic plan. (Another way of thinking about it – What is the organization’s mission and philosophy and how is this seen in its strategic plan?)
2. Describe methods used to meet the goals of a strategic plan using best practices. (Another way of thinking about it- What methods are being used by the organization to meet the goals of its strategic plan? Are these methods based on best practices?)
3. Critique evaluative effectiveness of a strategic plan. (Another way of thinking about it – How well is the strategic plan working? How is the organization evaluating w hat is being done? Are changes to the methods or plan being made based on results achieved?)
APA FORMAT
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Read the requirements of the Rubric prior to completion of the assignment.
Grading Rubric
| Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
| Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Evaluation paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of academic language. | Evaluation paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of academic language is acceptable. | Evaluation paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate academic language is required. | Evaluation paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for academic use. |
| Evaluation paper Organization and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
| Evaluation paper content/Relevance/Thinking | Evaluation paper content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Evaluation paper content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Evaluation paper content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Evaluation paper content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |
