Critique the case competition presentation at MHRM Case Team -

November 2, 2022

Critique the case competition presentation at MHRM Case Team

Order ID	35675990
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA/MLA/CHICAGO
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Critique the case competition presentation at MHRM Case Team

Critique the case competition presentation created by our MHRM Case Team at the Ohio State HR Invitational Case Competition conducted a few years back. The Pepsi sponsored case question centered on ways to reduce turnover of recent new hire graduates into the Pepsi organization.

Specifically, answer the following:

1. What is effective about the slide presentation?

2. What is ineffective?

3. How does it address elements within a Balanced Scorecard and HR Scorecard framework?

4. What was one of the key elements missing in the presentation?

Critique the case competition presentation at MHRM Case Team

	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Needs Improvement (2)	Poor (1)
Language/Spelling/ Grammar	Presentation has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language.	Presentation has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable.	Presentation has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required.	Presentation has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use.
Presentation Organization and Formatting	Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.	Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.	Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.	Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.
Presentation Content/Thinking	Presentation Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.	Presentation Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.	Presentation Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.	Presentation Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.