Authentic Leadership Leadership, Management, And Organizational Effectiveness -

November 2, 2022

Authentic Leadership Leadership, Management, And Organizational Effectiveness

Order ID	35675990
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA/MLA/CHICAGO
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Authentic Leadership Leadership, Management, And Organizational Effectiveness

Module 12: Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking: Authentic Leadership (120 points)

Authentic leadership focuses on leadership that is genuine and real. Whether something is genuine and real may likely be in the mind of the individual evaluating it or experiencing it.

Examine the usefulness of authentic leadership in organizations by identifying research that supports or refutes authentic leadership as a determinant of organizational or individual success.
Identify elements of authentic leadership. Describe the behavioral elements that one might objectively see in an authentic leader.
Include the role of emotional intelligence in authentic leadership.
Identify a nationally or internationally recognizable, currently living business figure who might be described as an authentic leader and justify your selection of that individual.
Next, critically evaluate your authentic leadership skills in relation to the behavioral elements and emotional intelligence you identified as important. Identify any areas for personal growth as a result of this examination.
Directions:

Write an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph to address the assignment’s guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question-and-answer format.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Be 3-5 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Current articles are those published in the last five years.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check–Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
In advance of submission, review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Needs Improvement (2)	Poor (1)
Language/Spelling/ Grammar	Presentation has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of business language.	Presentation has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of business language is acceptable.	Presentation has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate business language is required.	Presentation has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for business use.
Presentation Organization and Formatting	Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.	Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.	Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.	Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.
Presentation Content/Thinking	Presentation Content is comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.	Presentation Content is sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.	Presentation Content is fairly basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.	Presentation Content is very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.