Approaches to Stop Backbiting in Organizations
ORDER # | 100225 |
PAPER TYPE | ESSAY |
WRITING LEVEL | UNDERGRADUATE |
WRITING STYLE | APA/MLA |
# OF SOURCES | N/A |
# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT | 3≈ 825 WORDS |
Please watch the attached video and answer the three questions.
****HERE IS THE VIDEO ****
****INSTRUCTIONS****
Respond to the following questions:
You must submit your response either as a Microsoft Word document Your submission must be 400-825-words, clearly answering the questions provided. There is no reference requirement; however, your answers must be organized and full sentences.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Read the rubric before you start writing your paper.
Grading Rubric
Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) | |
Language/Spelling/ Grammar | Paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of organizational language. | Paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of organizational language is acceptable. | Paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate organizational language is required. | Paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for organizational use. |
Paper Organization and Formatting | Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements. | Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing. | Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately. | Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional. |
Paper content/relevance/Thinking | Paper content is relevant, comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough. | Paper content is relevant and sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough. | Paper content is fairly relevant, basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth. | Paper content is irrelevant, very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity. |