Approaches to Stop Backbiting in Organizations
|# OF SOURCES||N/A|
|# OF PAGES & WORD COUNT||3≈ 825 WORDS|
Please watch the attached video and answer the three questions.
****HERE IS THE VIDEO ****
Respond to the following questions:
You must submit your response either as a Microsoft Word document Your submission must be 400-825-words, clearly answering the questions provided. There is no reference requirement; however, your answers must be organized and full sentences.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Read the rubric before you start writing your paper.
|Excellent (4)||Good (3)||Needs Improvement (2)||Poor (1)|
|Paper has no spelling or punctuation errors and very few grammatical errors. Very well written and excellent use of organizational language.||Paper has a few punctuation or spelling errors. Few grammatical errors that don’t affect meaning. Well written and use of organizational language is acceptable.||Paper has some punctuation or spelling errors. Some grammatical errors but generally don’t affect meaning. Language is satisfactory overall but use of more appropriate organizational language is required.||Paper has numerous punctuation or spelling errors. Numerous grammatical errors that affect meaning. Language used is unprofessional and not appropriate for organizational use.|
|Paper Organization and Formatting||Relevant sections are included, and each is organized effectively. Formatting is professional and consistent and includes all required elements.||Relevant sections are included but could be a little better organized. Formatting is acceptable and/or one or two required elements are missing.||Relevant sections are included but organization could be improved. Formatting is inconsistent and/or many elements are missing or not formatted appropriately.||Sections are missing and/or poorly organized. Formatting is messy and unprofessional.|
|Paper content/relevance/Thinking||Paper content is relevant, comprehensive and detailed. Thinking and ideas are presented clearly, are engaging and thorough.||Paper content is relevant and sufficient. Thinking and ideas are clear but could be expanded to be more thorough.||Paper content is fairly relevant, basic and/or thinking and ideas lack some clarity and depth.||Paper content is irrelevant, very basic and thinking and ideas are superficial and lack clarity.|